Jump to navigation

Home
Login/Register
  • What we do
  • Who we are
  • Insights
  • Reports
  • White Space
  • Global Data Model
  • Emerging Trends
  • My account
 
 
 

Fiona Czerniawska

The year of “udsyn”

Alison Huntington

Who’s up and who’s down in the digital transformation war

Source EU

Brexit diary

Our directors are writing a series of blog posts about the UK public's choice to leave the EU

Read more


  

Microservices: How the future of consulting may start small

Tuesday 19th Jun, 2018

By Fiona Czerniawska.

In 1610, after months of painstaking work grinding his own lens, Galileo Galilei finally held his new telescope up to the night sky. What he saw astonished him: instead of a few hundred stars, he could see thousands, even millions.

The consulting “universe” has long been populated by a small number of large “planets”–strategy, technology, operational improvement, and so on–but if you were to carry out an equivalent of Galileo’s exercise in today’s market, then you’d see something that looks more like the Milky Way than a simple solar system.

The consulting market is fragmenting. Centrifugal forces are breaking up our familiar planets, based on the precise expertise required, on a changing sense of what a “reasonable” price is, and on a new generation of clients who know that the way they want to buy from consulting firms isn’t necessarily how the firm wants to sell or deliver to them.

In some ways this is actually helpful to consulting firms. They’ve long struggled to find distinctive ways of describing their services to clients–there being only so many ways you can say the word strategy, for instance. The rise of the microservice forces firms to be far more precise about what they do: generic strategy advice to the banking sector cedes to customer strategy for legacy financial products in emerging markets, and so on. Moreover, the narrower the focus, the smaller the number of competitors you face. Even the smaller market you end up with can be helpful, because its makes planning more tangible (which are the banks that will be interested in a proposition around legacy financial products in emerging markets?) and because your cost of sale should fall. You waste less time talking to people about something they’re not interested in, at least once you’ve recovered from the psychological shock that comes from realising that you now operate in a very small market.

The downside is that it creates at least the impression, perhaps even the reality, of inflexibility. “I’m sorry,” you can hear yourself saying to that generic banking client in the future, “but we don’t do strategy for banks, only customer strategy for banks that have an issue with their legacy financial products in emerging markets.” And as that example shows, there are significant marketing challenges in such an approach: How do you prevent clients falling asleep before you’ve got to the end of that sentence? Counterintuitively, microservices also reduce, rather than increase, greater specialisation. You can encourage people to specialise in the banking sector–it gives kudos and makes for more interesting work because of the greater depth of knowledge required. But asking someone to specialise in legacy banking projects in emerging markets sounds like you’re sending them down a career cul-de-sac: suddenly their whole lives are stretched out ahead of them doing the same legacy banking project work… If only to avoid the insanity that necessarily accompanies this Groundhog Day-like scenario, human beings want variety.

Fortunately, all is not lost. This is surely where technology steps in–indeed, the opportunity to embed technology deeper into the consulting process may be one of the factors driving the growth in microservices. Rather than build specialist knowledge in a reluctant human recipient, why not integrate it into your software?

So, is what we’re really talking about here assets and products (as consulting firms often choose to term them)? I think there’s a subtle, but important, distinction between a product and a micro-service, which all comes down to positioning and price. Clients, as we know from our research, are often unwilling to pay consulting fee rates for software, however clever the latter is, or however expensive it has been to develop.

Call it a service, even a micro-service, and you’ve got something that’s likely to be much closer to consulting in clients’ minds, so better able to command a higher price.

Blog categories: 
Skills and development, Market conditions, Business model

Comments

Duncan Hare replied on Tue, 2018-06-19 12:55 Permalink

Consulting Microservices and Commoditisation

A great summary as always, Fiona. This ties in with the piece we did (which you led) in 2013 on the Consultancy of the Future, where I talked about the commoditisation of the consulting market and its split into narrower/deeper specialisms versus generalist services/people (the latter indistinguishable from agencies). You've touched on the challenges for the consultancies. The big challenge for clients remains how to plug and play" (commission, use and integrate) these services. That requires a better grasp of your own business architecture than they generally have at the moment. I predict that the winning organisations will be those that are best able to integrate internal and external services, both in terms of operations (internal versus outsourcing) and change (internal versus consulting). We're not there yet, so that means this is where real opportunities still exist for consultancies: helping clients to become better "service integrators". If consultancies want this to result in long-term recurring revenue, then they will need to develop products/tools/services that support service integration continuously. Needless to say (but I'll say it anyway), we've been doing that for a while
  • reply

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The validation is not case sensitive.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Share this article

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
e-mail icon

Subscribe to our content

Subscribe to Source Global Research blog
Subscribe

Categories


  • All items

  • Market conditions
  • Business model
  • Client behaviour
  • Client-consultant relationship
  • Strategic planning
  • Marketing
  • Thought leadership
  • Strategy consulting
  • Big Four firms
  • Brand
  • For your amusement
  • Technology consulting
  • Quality and value
  • Pricing
  • Management thinking
  • Procurement
  • Innovation
  • Growth
  • Digital
  • Skills and development
  • Consulting in the GCC
  • Instinct
  • Specialist firms
  • Recession
  • Financial services consulting
  • HR consulting
  • Public sector consulting
  • Talent
  • IT consulting
  • Brexit Diary
  • Risk
  • Advice vs implementation
  • Internal consultants
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Globalisation
  • Tax
  • What we do
  • Who we are
  • Insights
  • Reports
  • White Space
  • Global Data Model
  • Emerging Trends
  • My account
  • Login
  • Create a new account
  • Reset your password

© 2009 - 2025 Source Information Services Ltd | Registration No: 06439935
Terms and conditions of use | Privacy policy

    • What we do
    • Who we are
    • Insights
    • Reports
    • White Space
    • Global Data Model
    • Emerging Trends
    • My account
    • Contact
      Contact us

      If you'd like to hear more about how we can help, call us on:
      +44 (0)20 3478 1204
      +1 (0)800 767 8058
      or email us here.

      Become one of us

      We’re always on the lookout for bright and enthusiastic people who would like to join us in our adventure.
      Interested?
      View our careers page here

      Head office address

      20 Little Britain
      London EC1A 7DH
      United Kingdom