By Fiona Czerniawska.

Some will say they had it coming.

As a group, chief HR officers and HR directors have never had a particularly comfortable seat at the corporate table. Outgunned by COOs, CFOs, and CIOs, most have found it difficult to make their voices heard; usually unable to measure the impact of what they do, they’ve often been consigned to the margins of decision-making. Now, to make that worse, much of what the HR function does is being swallowed up by shared services centres—and that’s just a prelude to complete digitisation. Employees can do increasing amounts of admin themselves, and they have a greater incentive to ensure personal information is accurate and up-to-date. Sifting through candidates for recruitment can be done by algorithms. Who needs HR anymore?

It’s tempting to say that the consulting industry does.

We estimate that the HR consulting industry, excluding implementation, regulatory compliance work, and hardware and software, was worth around $7.3bn in 2015. Not the biggest of consulting markets (using the same definitions, the technology consulting market was worth more than five times as much), but one that’s been attractive to strategy firms and the Big Four in the last decade because they’ve been able to take advantage of a chronic lack of innovation among the conventional HR consulting firms to grow their market shares.

However, much of this growth has come from relationships outside the HR function—from CEOs who recognise the importance of strategic workforce planning at a time of demographic change and growing barriers to mobility, and from CFOs; many of whom now have ultimate responsibility for HR. The disappearance of the CHRO is only going to make this easier for the Big Four and strategy firms to sell their services, precisely because they haven’t had strong relationships with this group in the past. The rapidly changing face of the HR function and the pace of digitisation creates an opening for technology firms to increase their market share, too.

But whether you’re an HR specialist looking to fend off new competitors, or a non-HR firm looking to exploit the changing market conditions, it will be crucial to be able to offer a multidisciplinary approach. HR expertise will need to be melded with the capability to re-design processes, prototype digital solutions, and create integrated platforms that combine consulting with managed services. Saying that you do this is one thing, but making it a behind the scenes reality is far more of a challenge. For strategy and technology firms, the issue is how quickly they can build (or buy) the missing pieces in their particular jigsaw puzzle. The Big Four have all the pieces but the latter have typically been broken up into different business units, and these silos can be reinforced by different remuneration structures, culture, and of course organisational politics.

The demise of the HR function represents a huge opportunity for consulting firms. The irony is that they have to solve their own, internal HR issues if they’re going to seize it.

Blog categories: 

Comments

There's an estimated $2 billion being spent annually by HR on Employee Engagement. A two year search of academic and commercial research, case studies, articles by the likes of Gallup, Aon, Towers Perrin Watson, Carnegie, Deloitte and hundreds of individuals claiming to be EE experts, and finally a very large number of survey companies, not a single claim of engagement improving to the point the business was affected. In fact, I could not find results mentioned in anyone's marketing materials. As your article points out, HR is simply not positioned to overcome the politics, culture, and silos that serve as the blockers of change. So I think you're spot on. I apologize for the shameless boast here, but for twenty years we have been making huge transformations in employee engagement. In one case engaging employees to deliver a $300 million SG&A reduction, a $200 million capital reduction, a $45 million inventory reduction and reducing previously announced layoffs by 1800. All that in just ten weeks and not a single invoice for consulting or expenses. Our fees are based on the impact on the income statement. We do this by reporting directly to the CEO and becoming agents for the employee's suggestions. By suspending the culture, politics, and silos nearly all resistance is eliminated because the debate will end only at the CEO's desk. HR has absolutely no involvement other than having a plate full of action items of their own to deal with. Perhaps $2 billion a year delivering no impact isn't all that big of a deal, but you can certainly add that to your assessment that HR is going to have to change and I doubt the change will increase their range of responsibilities.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The validation is not case sensitive.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.